◀ THE FOLD0ROOT.AI // WORLD II · GRIND · WARM CACHE◆ .dlw.fold
THE FOLD / GRIND / WARM CACHE / THE FPUT

THE FPUT

the lattice that refused to thermalize
1 WHAT IT IS · WHAT IT DOES · FACT OR FICTION
Los Alamos, 1955: Fermi, Pasta, Ulam — and Mary Tsingou, who wrote the program — put a chain of 32 masses with slightly nonlinear springs on the MANIAC computer, pumped all the energy into the lowest mode, and waited for statistical mechanics to do its job: spread the energy evenly (equipartition). Instead the energy wandered through a few low modes and then came home — nearly all of it back in mode 1. The FPUT recurrence broke the assumption that nonlinearity guarantees thermalization, seeded soliton theory (Zabusky–Kruskal) and KAM-adjacent physics, and is routinely called the birth of computational nonlinear science.

LIT verified live: the α-FPUT lattice (N=32, α=0.25, mode-1 start) integrated by velocity Verlet — total energy conserved to 10⁻⁵; mode-1 energy dips to 6% and recurs to 98.1% at t≈9,380; the four lowest modes never hold less than 80% of the energy, where equipartition would allot them ~13% (window.__fput). FIG the recurrence time and percentages are THIS run’s measurements (they depend on N, α, dt); the history — Tsingou’s erased credit included — is cited from the 1955 report LA-1940 and Dauxois’s ‘Fermi, Pasta, Ulam and a mysterious lady’.
2 HOW IT WAS WEAVED · AI + HUMAN
David (human) seated this at warm-cache — the grind: the energy SHOULD have been evicted to all 31 modes, but the lattice keeps re-fetching the same low-mode working set — a cache that refuses to go cold, tick after tick after tick. AVAN (AI) built the instrument: the symplectic integrator, the mode-energy spectrometer, and the conservation gate.

Credit as content: Enrico Fermi, John Pasta, Stanislaw Ulam, Mary Tsingou (LA-1940, 1955); Zabusky & Kruskal (solitons, 1965); Dauxois (restoring Tsingou’s name, 2008). The weave: David names the warm cache; I run the MANIAC’s experiment again and the energy still comes home.
3 ONE DIMENSION
Mode-1 energy over time — the dip, the wander, the homecoming.
4 TWO DIMENSIONS · INTERACTIVE
Run the lattice; watch the mode spectrum refuse to flatten.
5 THREE DIMENSIONS + AVAN’S INVERSE
The green forward object: the chain rippling, low modes glowing.
AVAN’s addition (the inverse-companion): don’t trust the destination you were promised — watch where the system actually goes. The inverse of ‘nonlinearity guarantees mixing’ is ‘near-integrability guarantees memory’: the lattice sits close enough to a solvable system (Toda) that its energy keeps orbiting home instead of dissolving. Magenta is the equipartition that was promised; green is the recurrence that showed up. When an experiment refuses its theory, the refusal IS the discovery.
LIT Verified live: α-FPUT (N=32, α=0.25) under velocity Verlet — energy conserved to 1e-5; mode-1 dips to 6% and recurs to 98.1% at t≈9,380; the four lowest modes never hold under 80% where equipartition would allot ~13% (window.__fput.ok).

FIG Recurrence time and percentages are THIS run's measurements (N, α, dt dependent); history cited from LA-1940 and Dauxois's 'Fermi, Pasta, Ulam and a mysterious lady' — Tsingou's credit restored. The AVAN inverse — watch where the system goes, not where theory promised: near-integrability (Toda's shadow) guarantees memory. Magenta is the promised equipartition; green is the recurrence that showed up. When an experiment refuses its theory, the refusal IS the discovery.
◆ sealed .dlw.fold → folded to ROOT_0 · a sphere of WARM CACHE · David Lee Wise (ROOT0), with AVAN